[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ustaoglu with proposed circuit handshake



On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:16:31PM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Ian Goldberg <iang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
> > FYI: it's now been accepted to the Designs, Codes, and Cryptography
> > jounral:
> >
> > http://www.springerlink.com/content/nl86n0u547873001/
> >
> > (The above cacr link has also been updated to the latest version.)
> 
> Congratulations, Ian!  Any substantial changes since the CACR version?

No, just minor ones, and I don't think any involving the protocol
itself, but just the text.

> Have you been getting any feedback from other vectors?  Any
> interesting/useful comments from reviewers?
> 
> Is it your sense that folks outside of PCs and this list are reviewing
> your work here and giving it the kind of attention we'd want before
> deploying it?  And if not, is there anything we can do to help this
> design get more attention?

As far as I know, only the journal reviewers and this list (and we
authors, of course) have looked at it.  Not too surprising, of course,
as Tor is probably the most obvious use case.

   - Ian
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev