Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 190: Password-based Bridge Client Authorization

[Robert Ransom <rransom.8774@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 2012-01-18, Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Robert Ransom <rransom.8774@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> With that hack on top of the v3 protocol, any client able to detect
>> that a bridge is not being MITMed can impersonate the bridge through
>> the TLS handshake, until after the (honest, victim) client speaks the
>> Tor protocol at the fake bridge.
>
> Seems mostly harmless; the only point of a shared secret there is to
> keep scanning from working.  Anybody who tries the above attack
> already know that the bridge is there; all they learn is that the
> client knew too, which they probably could have figured out as an
> eavesdropper.

Censoring MITM attackers tend to MITM all SSL/TLS connections,
regardless of their destination.  No one would benefit from performing
a targeted MITM attack on a bridge, even if we implemented bridge
passwords in such a way that a MITM attacker can obtain the password
needed to connect to (and use) a bridge.


Robert Ransom
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev