Re: [tor-dev] All the problems about Stegotorous

[George Kadianakis <desnacked@xxxxxxxxxx>]

vmonmoonshine@xxxxxxxxx writes:

> I summed up the discussion plus what I had in mind with in 15 tickets
> that I put on the track.
>
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=needs_information&status=needs_review&status=needs_revision&status=new&status=reopened&component=Stegotorus&order=priority
>
> Zack is going to suppliment it with few more steg module concerns. By
> that time we should have a fairly complete list. 
>

The code monkey inside me doesn't see any code-quality-related tickets
in that URL. stegotorus boasts 12k LoC of C++ and some of that code
was written in haste. Looking at this from a deployment point of view,
I feel much more relaxed and easygoing with deploying programs written
in a high-level language (like Flashproxy or pyobfsproxy) than with
deploying an unaudited C++ program with many bad code moments.

I think that a trac ticket with a bit of research on how painful would
be to write a deployable <high-level language>-port of stegotorus
would be a good idea. I know that Zack is also interested in exploring
this avenue.
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev