Hi meejah, Thanks for checking it out! > For sure "prototyping stuff" was the first thing that sprang to my mind > as being useful; I've always had good success using Python to do > proof-of-concept things -- and sometimes it's simply fast enough > already. Yes...I've actually been somewhat pleasantly surprised by the performance so far, with the caveat that it's mainly been tested with just web browsing (although that does include streaming videos). > I'd suggest looking at Chutney (a Tor testing framework) with an eye to > having your implementation as one option for "a Tor instance" to > instantiate. Certainly, if you wanted to go along the > protocol-testing/fuzzing lines, that would be a good place to start. > https://gitweb.torproject.org/chutney.git/ Thank you for posting this. I will definitely take a look at Chutney and consider how oppy can potentially integrate with it. This can hopefully also give me a better idea at how to more rigorously test oppy. > It would also be beneficial to have some unit-tests. Definitely. After getting some feedback from people on this list, my immediate mental roadmap for this project is starting to look something like: - Write comprehensive unit/regression tests. - Squash known bugs and stuff that's flushed out in the testing process. - Begin fixing more protocol-level issues that are not in full compliance with tor-spec. > I'm certainly excited to check it out some more...Thanks for releasing > it! Absolutely! Thanks again for having a look. Best, Nik On 01/21/2015 12:05 AM, meejah wrote: > > I've barely had time to poke at this much, but it's really neat. I was > actually originally going to call "txtorcon" simply "txtor" but figured > I'd leave that name in case anyone wrote an actual Tor implementation as > a Twisted protocol -- which I guess you've now done :) [...and you're > welcome to the name if you want]. > > Anyway. > > For sure "prototyping stuff" was the first thing that sprang to my mind > as being useful; I've always had good success using Python to do > proof-of-concept things -- and sometimes it's simply fast enough > already. > > I'd suggest looking at Chutney (a Tor testing framework) with an eye to > having your implementation as one option for "a Tor instance" to > instantiate. Certainly, if you wanted to go along the > protocol-testing/fuzzing lines, that would be a good place to start. > https://gitweb.torproject.org/chutney.git/ > > It would also be beneficial to have some unit-tests. > > I'm certainly excited to check it out some more...Thanks for releasing > it! > > Cheers, > meejah > _______________________________________________ > tor-dev mailing list > tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev