[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 264: Putting version numbers on the Tor subprotocols




On 7 Jan 2016, at 10:14, Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

  We shouldn't add protocols for features where others can remain
  oblivious to their presence or absence.  For example, if some
  directory caches start supporting a new header, and clients can
  safely send that header without knowing whether the directory cache
  will understand it, then a new protocol version is not required.

  Because all relays currently on the network are 0.2.4.19 or later, we
  can require 0.2.4.19, and use 0.2.4.19 as the minimal version so we
  we don't need to do code archeology to determine which number

You did that thing where you start a sentence 

Otherwise looks good, modulo a few typos that don't affect meaning.

Tim

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP 968F094B

teor at blah dot im
OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev