Re: [tor-dev] Much-revised draft, RFC: removing current obsolete clients from the network

[s7r <s7r@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hello,

I think the solution to change the consensus format - section 3.3 is
by far superior vs changing the ports on directory authorities or
disabling old link protocols at relays side.

Changing the consensus format is the cleanest way to do it and it has
smallest chances to degrade performance on working up to date clients.
Might as well make add the synonym as fast as possible, when we also
add the shared randomness value in the consensus document, because
it'll take quite some time until we are ready to say 'let's disable
all Tor versions before today'.

On 1/14/2016 6:26 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Nick Mathewson
> <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> [This is a significantly revised version of the last version of
>> this proposal draft, sent here for comment.
>> 
>> The last version of this draft was 
>> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-September/009587.html
>>
>> 
.  This is more or less a complete rewrite, after I convinced myself
>> that the original ideas wouldn't work.
>> 
>> Part of the functionality of that old draft has been subsumed in
>> proposal 264.]
>> 
> 
> This is now proposal 266.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWl897AAoJEIN/pSyBJlsRLd4H/02MUaOVyHxM/O0iWVcX2qMm
jnwGvlotVpKhCitb6eA19ah0R5iaX4u87VHxPB7+Z7TrJv1Hshe5cFrztNdkKLR2
5JJ/X2pAuC+kiY+LoPBEOSZroIK9/XIt8M4e/RMZeLHtmeiJevlwcx494FiYmcaz
mn2aBSaqy+ncecvg2q23wNUbanga6pCR52I5xIy4hcENl3RzUCUeDWCkLI31KV/U
09evLvByphP/mQormo/iQj/JDpPUtb9deaLSDhegemrIzdutaSyn0Qyzk9c9PWTs
lYkbduw7HOwacGjIrEDmfdbplCiXfVhQxO/q5QYyvpgor4N2etFw2EMqfqrXoDw=
=J1Oy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev