Re: [tor-dev] RFC: Using `utls` in meek_lite.

[David Fifield <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 07:44:48AM +0000, Yawning Angel wrote:
> On 1/24/19 7:38 AM, David Fifield wrote:
> > I see, you're right. It has to do with the reuse of the initConn.
> 
> A proper "general" solution that solves that problem and the ALPN issue
> is to have a `initConn` and `http.RoundTripper` instance per destination
> host, and some additional locking.
> 
> With more implementation cleverness this could be brought down to two
> `http.RoundTripper` instances, and a host -> pointer + net.Conn map, and
> some locking.
> 
> But for something like meek_lite where the number of destination hosts
> is not large, the existing wrapper works fine and I don't see much
> reason to over engineer it.

I don't disagree, it's fine for this use case.
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev