[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal 109: No more than one server per IP address [was Re: Sybil Attack Countermeasures]

To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Proposal 109: No more than one server per IP address [was Re: Sybil Attack Countermeasures]
From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:23:07 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:23:28 -0400
In-reply-to: <20070312033322.GB13819@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <1895070c0703091528r67b2f305j4a07360eb90ab3eb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070311092854.GC28282@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070312033322.GB13819@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 11:33:22PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> I've added the original proposal as "109-no-sharing-ips.txt", retitled
> it to No more than one server per IP address, and merged in Roger's
> suggestions (except for those that represent an alternative approach;
> I've put those at the end).

Proposal 109 is now implemented in svn.  Thanks to Kevin and Damon for
taking time to write it up, and for all their help and patience!

(For details, see
   http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/109-no-sharing-ips.txt
)

yrs,
-- 
Nick Mathewson

Attachment: pgpfTXZ5KAsbG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Prev by Author: Correct formulas for exit weights [was Re: Exit Balancing Patch]
Next by Author: Re: [or-cvs] r10974: Be even more aggressive about separating local traffic from (in tor/trunk: . doc/spec/proposals src/or)
Previous by thread: Re: OR outgoing IP address
Next by thread: Re: [or-cvs] r10974: Be even more aggressive about separating local traffic from (in tor/trunk: . doc/spec/proposals src/or)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread