On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Damian Johnson
<atagar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> (What I'm *not* thrilled about is the idea of using an embedded
> interpreter for this kind of stuff, or embarking on any direction that
> requires us to rewrite too much of the program at once. That way, in
> my opinion, lies long-term destabilization.)
Understandable, though doesn't avoiding an interpreter drop most
modern languages from consideration (and any sandboxing an interpreter
would provide)? What did you have in mind instead?
I would like to point out the existence of some modern, high-level, compiled languages. For instance: Haskell, OCaml, and Go.
Cheers! -Damian
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev