> On 10 Jul 2015, at 11:35 , teor <teor2345@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On 10 Jul 2015, at 09:47 , Cory Pruce <corypruce@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> Signed PGP part >> >>> >>> Well, you could test my latest branches for #14175: >> >> Hey Tim, I got the branch of chutney and tor and made sure that the >> commands you run in the comments of the issue exist. What do you think >> would be a good way to start testing? Begin with a static analysis of >> the code? > > If you can read Python and shell script, then checking I haven't made any obvious coding errors in my changes would help. But that might require becoming familiar with the codebase - which may take some effort. > > The diffs are here, or you can use git diff: > https://github.com/teor2345/chutney/compare/feature14175-chutney-performance-v2 > https://github.com/teor2345/tor/compare/feature14175-chutney-performance-v2 This commit contains all the tor changes: https://github.com/teor2345/tor/commit/128d4a68967fb2986965e9f8443f362a9dc20ecc (The github comparison picked the wrong base branch, so it's huge and unhelpful.) Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev