[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: Two hop paths from entry guards

To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Proposal: Two hop paths from entry guards
From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:38:15 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:38:24 -0400
In-reply-to: <a793ef6f0706261045l7a441a04x1cc91b6c13cb8215@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <a793ef6f0706261045l7a441a04x1cc91b6c13cb8215@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 10:45:15AM -0700, Michael Lieberman wrote:
> Title: Two hop paths from entry guards

Thanks!  I'll check this in as Proposal 116.

-- 
Nick Mathewson

Attachment: pgpFQ7qihFbVx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Proposal: Two hop paths from entry guards
  - From: Michael Lieberman

Prev by Author: Re: prevent tor accepting dns requests on dnsport initiated by itself
Next by Author: Re: check for conflicting *Port directives
Previous by thread: Proposal: Two hop paths from entry guards
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread