Hi all, On 2 Jun 2019, at 05:22, Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'd like to confirm the problem before we make major network changes. (And I'd like to know how widespread it is.) Which bandwidth authorities are limiting the consensus weight of these relays? Where are they located? Are the relays' observed bandwidths limiting their consensus weight? Here's how the operator can find out: If the relays are being measured by longclaw's sbws instance, we should also look at their detailed measurement diagnostics. longclaw's bandwidth file is available at:
Do we have funding to continue to improve the bandwidth measurement infrastructure? Or to maintain it? If we don't have any grants in the pipeline, now would be a good time to start some.
Splitting bandwidth between multiple relays has privacy implications, because traffic is easier to track between instances. It also increases the size of the consensus. So we should choose a value for AuthDirMaxServersPerAddr that is a compromise between these competing goals. Why is 4 better than 3 or 5? T |
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev