Re: oprofiling 0.1.2.8-beta

To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: oprofiling 0.1.2.8-beta
From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 09:28:50 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-dev@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 12:29:06 -0500
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LF7pZ+J+3C1z+CBCMQhSBfh9jurQtcBmLgFfl5fTxNyo8mDJ/0qJv0WGM0tx+hlzeT78f3DOb/R+M8vV5Q13tQ/kN1fFxgrQFx/UQiGc8qV2KuOGqTUIfQmUeVVM/Dhx0oDT3Cr9n90f/sUCyHBVsnmNMeHlhl1Tk7tW4LEiIwc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gZeGsYsdWQCvvHTR30paTM8oQ1o/g3vn/d89eeGuG59m770FKyv30dWRM6fStXi4yDO8h+vTaMmgf4zUf6YdkcYTo9LmLNXNGhwSmUeLFggCwD7c5aX80cZz4fraX22Hh3OofHp7r9ivEVas+RJbCDLLHmb7w5prNTKIXtcwRho=
In-reply-to: <45E95303.1080705@esat.kuleuven.be>
References: <20070228225821.GB6943@asteria.noreply.org> <20070303102651.GA6755@asteria.noreply.org> <45E95303.1080705@esat.kuleuven.be>
Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 3/3/07, George Danezis <george.danezis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

... Do you have any idea what those could be?

> samples  %        app name                 symbol name
> 221120130 13.3603  libz.so.1                (no symbols)


libz is compress* call here.

> 113710474 6.8705 libc.so.6 (no symbols)


probably the event dispatch in libevent calling epoll_add/dispatch.

is there a second set of libs with symbols intact for libc/libz for debian?

References:
- Re: oprofiling 0.1.2.8-beta
  - From: Peter Palfrader
- Re: oprofiling 0.1.2.8-beta
  - From: George Danezis