Yan Zhu: > On 03/17/2014 04:41 AM, Gunes Acar wrote: > > Hi Yan, > > > > Glad that you're interested in the project. > > It'd be very nice collaborate with you on this. > > > > Indeed, we've been corresponding with Peter for a related project and > > I mentioned my intention to work as a middleman between EFF and Tor. > > > > Great, it seems that Peter and I are both interested and willing to help. > > Regarding > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6119#comment:10, Peter > says he has some reluctance to open source the project (not the data) > because it might make it easier for some websites to track visitors > without their consent. This might have been a valid concern 5 years ago, but now it's just a joke. The tests on Panopticlick are ancient, widely known, easy to reproduce, and since then much more severe and invasive mechanisms of fingerprinting have since been developed/deployed in modern browsers. Moreover, only 2 of the tests it performs actually apply to Tor Browser users. Banks in particular have already deployed some of the techniques we've fixed that the EFF study entirely predates. And these techniques are far higher entropy than browser resolution (such as localhost open port enumeration, OS theme fingerprinting, and HTML5+WebGL canvas rendering+extraction+hashing). Not only should we (as Tor) publicly provide tests and easy-to-deploy working PoC code for all of these vectors, we should also endeavor to detail cases where major browser vendors are ignoring or exacerbating this problem, and make it easy for everyone to test and observe this behavior themselves. Not sure if that means the EFF now has a conflict of interest with this project for some ridiculous reason, but frankly any attempt at trying to "hide" these techniques is downright silly. They are too well known (most are publicly documented elsewhere, or at least on our bugtracker), and there's waaay too much money on the other side of the fence in terms of incentives to develop and deploy working attacks. Further, starting the from EFF codebase might also be a hindrance to us. It is not designed for measuring the effects of defenses. In fact, its measurement mechanisms actively penalize any attempt at defense development (because any approach to alter browser behavior instantly makes you more unique than the previous userbase). I actually think Panopticlick has of late done more to prevent browser fingerprinting defense development than to encourage it. I would really like to see it DIAF. Here's hoping we can make something better! -- Mike Perry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev