[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-dev] Notes from the prop259 proposal reading group
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 01:51:53PM +0200, George Kadianakis wrote:
> In the future we should make it so that all Guards are both Stable and Fast,
> so that this stupid check does not need to happen [TODO: I should open a
> ticket for this if it doesn't already exist].
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/18624 -- it even comes
with a patch. :)
> In the future (almost) all guards will be directory guards so this should
> become less of an issue (see #12538).
On first thought, I would advocate for a similar approach here - if
almost all guards are foo, and it's complicated to handle non-foo guards,
and simple to ask guards to do foo, then let's do the simple thing.
--Roger
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev