On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:03:47 -0500 Brandon Wiley <brandon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am familiar with the dual stack problem generally, where servers > have both IPv4 and IPv6 IP addresses. I was not involved in any > conversations regarding the dual stack problem for Pluggable > Transports specifically. If you could point me to any documentation > on this issue, that would be helpful. Alternatively, if you could > explain what the issue is and what possible solutions you'd like to > see in a future Pluggable Transports specification, that is something > we could make happen in future specifications revisions. None of the things I've mentioned are new concerns, and I brought all of them up (and more) a long time ago back when I was giving thought to the PT spec. I've basically given up at this point, and to be honest I gave up shortly after I initially started making noises about improving the spec because it was clear that while I was trying to improve the existing interface while preserving the overall architecture, everyone else was far more interested in "lets make everything into a bunch of library code". https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-September/009432.html https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/21261 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/11211 Regards, -- Yawning Angel
Attachment:
pgpC26vIRoL0u.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev