Re: [tor-dev] Tor Friendliness Scanner

Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Tor Friendliness Scanner

From: Kevin Gallagher <kcg295@xxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:08:29 -0400

Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:08:45 -0400

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nyu.edu; h=reply-to : subject : to : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type; s=20180315; bh=SKcrFEfiZXO6XODiu5hC4flG23dtT25GD4fZdZy/2mw=; b=SANnrpLtvCKLkOOyr9fMhlR0tmdgDN1H2Zw8m2QocanUUMrm6920YTyM/RHytxwnsShl lKTHvitcha9EgmxFaW5IkcsbzePmsHsg7zweiuciKxnxnPpEzPloKt+8AItb7eLZJb6W 91wTlpB88L7yyfYD1AZbpdrTZJZ0SEVht4hf0xyAuQp6dzgWsu4w6AcVO5ndbsH1KWaa iOVZUq0+/9iN8EcoyVmTtLKex8SKSecJWkMqbTPQlsWjkPwJ3cr0DCqvQ85pSYEqBDs5 v7rga9rc4/iD1O1eCxQfx1l+nXafVa5O46cXaJHu3wvP58IfzvGz25BOHIzArdeskIRP Zw==

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nyu-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=reply-to:subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=SKcrFEfiZXO6XODiu5hC4flG23dtT25GD4fZdZy/2mw=; b=uYrG4Ayd7MMAnLcvQtgEBAtMOpU3LSIzj82YY34EfYRde3yZnFSFefRFMk3Dun6Ms5 YcV6SNwPE8q2qzP4ISRqFIV5B7R03PJvs4PmISnEbxLDQoDICgeExuM6YHEWCPPf2Asv I+TDdlE4RBu9WaLqUEdI/IlxcHf8sT2J70sCUkJrhM68sill8mpVTa2n3+Drsiz5L3oy xD+F4e41PqMi/Z5qXIHSg/vYzT/LSObV7Ndgt3FpEDM5t2P9t+LNlmiuGc4UsaFCUqQn utTKKx4EyMPzN/DZ806Zze8usRCJBhPWBNt588EDylRyjzgnjQWb2IDPKsbyEwLRyIHv qydQ==

In-reply-to: <CANjHfr4GZOEvs3NzMZ5C8myMq0MMDHdEY6iFbee9Ma9eCLSHKA@mail.gmail.com>

List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/>

List-help: <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>

List-id: discussion regarding Tor development <tor-dev.lists.torproject.org>

List-post: <mailto:tor-dev@lists.torproject.org>

List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Organization: New York University

References: <b4c64cac-014b-8f70-6361-882b5259916e@nyu.edu> <80ff2fca-d164-61d4-642b-afd46e5cda4e@torproject.org> <1097e658-7e3a-9edb-9a3b-27f9d2005638@nyu.edu> <CANjHfr4_4Q7KvKoLbR9LrSXudxAdwTr6k2H2KSvtFiPZusOKjw@mail.gmail.com> <8CD7654E-6280-45F5-B0EB-9EADB974BCAE@riseup.net> <CANjHfr4GZOEvs3NzMZ5C8myMq0MMDHdEY6iFbee9Ma9eCLSHKA@mail.gmail.com>

Reply-to: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sender: "tor-dev" <tor-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3

On 3/17/19 8:18 PM, Ryan Duff wrote:

Hi again,

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 7:40 PM teor <teor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Most sites block by IP (or IP range), so a direct connection using the
exit node's IP should give you very similar results to a Tor circuit
using the exit node's IP.

Thanks teor! The point still stand though even though my solution to it is flawed. The thing being measured will be friendliness towards the Tor Browser instead of Tor overall. Basically, the measurement will be "friendly to Tor but not the Tor Browser". If that's the intent, then there is no real issue. I don't know how many sites will render for a Tor exit node but also only have issues with the Tor Browser itself but I'm definitely interested in seeing that data.

Yes, I should be clear about this. I am interested in the issues related to the Tor Browser, since the network level issues are already very well studied. For this project, only the Tor Browser is being considered.

I suppose, then, that I should call it the "Tor Browser Friendliness Scanner," but I didn't give that much thought to the name. Sorry about that!

- Kevin

-Ryan

-- 
Kevin Gallagher
Ph.D. Candidate
Center For Cybersecurity
NYU Tandon School of Engineering
Key Fingerprint: D02B 25CB 0F7D E276 06C3  BF08 53E4 C50F 8247 4861

_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev