[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: udp transport PoC

To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: udp transport PoC
From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 22:25:45 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 15 May 2008 01:25:50 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=vJiuLA5yBdNTWmQ6xKt0NvxVqrCfoqbEHhwqK7IAWZo=; b=tabtDYLByOEBEvZEAeD3R8uv791zG2fL8OI0Ot0qGQnbbrcIS45ykCvqZkltzJm1a8/4BKyr57wyu9O+T8EZApkyTD84i2qj/kVm2092eGPSUFmTGPPYxjvXP240pOhnciHEeEHOfU2BCg3J8qC3Od3CMEpqInGkwEEH5G7EmKE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=i75a8In46up7i2SqN330xKm7TMP5msLmTqwQQI1PhNEV+CqB2eflg9XFU/qf/Z/ipo5A6MZ11suyrIXp5iGQAs68a1Q450qj+Ue9Yg7TwE+PwT0Eu0HATuq1MUdqZIhJ4upLJEASMPYv2iFNxCDnUD/5xoNWvKV5XAtkKG1CQr8=
In-reply-to: <482B1077.50604@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <47FA70A9.30607@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080409010659.GA8644@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080513205015.GD4518@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <396556a20805131511tb444757yf1815754e31df4c7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ef5fec60805132231l69043e22s56f365312802d9f4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <482B1077.50604@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Camilo Viecco <cviecco@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
> The key to efficient use of a packet based network is
> congestion control/avoidance. In partcular when the network characteristics
> are so varied as what Tor nodes provide. I rather reuse a 'good enough
> solution'

i forgot to mention DCCP for datagram congestion control; still very
beta, if even supported on your OS, but would solve the TCP fairness /
congestion control part well.

best regards,

References:
- Re: udp transport PoC
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re: udp transport PoC
  - From: Adam Langley
- Re: udp transport PoC
  - From: coderman
- Re: udp transport PoC
  - From: Camilo Viecco

Prev by Author: Re: udp transport PoC
Next by Author: Re: [proposal 136] Re: Proposal: Simplify Configuration of Private Tor Networks
Previous by thread: Re: udp transport PoC
Next by thread: Re: udp transport PoC
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread