[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: GeoIP database comparison

To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: GeoIP database comparison
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 05:49:44 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 06 May 2010 05:49:51 -0400
In-reply-to: <20100503184013.dsj0xrfxckcww0kc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20100503184013.dsj0xrfxckcww0kc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 06:40:13PM +0200, Martin Mulazzani wrote:
> TorStatus is already using the Maxmind GeoLite database.

I've been wondering for a while why
http://trunk.torstatus.kgprog.com/index.php
has so many relays listed as Namibia. They're pretty clearly not in
Namibia.

--Roger

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GeoIP database comparison
  - From: Karsten Loesing

References:
- Re: Re: GeoIP database comparison
  - From: Martin Mulazzani

Prev by Author: Re: Integrating libnatpnp and miniupnpc into Tor
Next by Author: Re: GeoIP database comparison
Previous by thread: Re: Re: GeoIP database comparison
Next by thread: Re: GeoIP database comparison
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread