[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] Revising Proposal 140



On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:27:38 -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> One alternative in this case would be to include non-running relays in
> the consensus.  This would make each individual consensus longer, but
> (if your guess is right) might make compressed diffs shorter.

That's an interesting idea. We could include non-running relays in the
consensus for, say, half a day. I don't know how often do relays
temporarily stop running, or how long do they generally do it for - I
shall investigate.

-- 
Daniel Martí - mvdan@xxxxxxxx - http://mvdan.cc/
PGP: A9DA 13CD F7A1 4ACD D3DE  E530 F4CA FFDB 4348 041C

Attachment: pgpdQyb1R7ucd.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev