[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] [proposal] Post-Quantum Secure Hybrid Handshake Based on NewHope



On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 11:17 +0000, Yawning Angel wrote:
> Well, if we move the handshake identifier inside the AE(AD) envelope,
> we can also add padding to normalize the handshake length at minimal
> extra CPU cost by adding a length field and some padding inside as
> well.
> 
> It would remove some of the advantages of using algorithms with
> shorter
> keys (since it would result in more traffic on the wire than otherwise
> would have been), but handshakes will be indistinguishable to anyone
> but space aliens and the final destinations...

Is that even beneficial though?  

If we choose our post-quantum algorithm randomly from New Hope and SIDH,
and add random delays, then maybe an adversary has less information
about when a circuit build is progressing to the next hop, or when it's
actually being used? 

Is there some long delay between circuit build and first use that makes
anything done to obscure build useless? 

Jeff

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev