[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-dev] Walking onions: week 10 update
Walking Onions: week 10 update
On our current grant from the zcash foundation, I'm working on a
full specification for the Walking Onions design. I'm going to try to
send out these updates once a week.
My previous updates are linked below:
Week 1:
formats, preliminaries, git repositories, binary diffs,
metaformat decisions, and Merkle Tree trickery.
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-March/014178.html
Week 2:
Specifying details of SNIP and ENDIVE formats, in CDDL.
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-March/014181.html
Week 3:
Expanding ENDIVEs into SNIPs.
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-March/014194.html
Week 4:
Voting (part 1) and extending circuits.
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-March/014207.html
Week 5:
Voting (part 2)
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-April/014218.html
Week 6:
Editing, voting rules, and client behavior (part 1)
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-April/014222.html
Week 7:
Exit policies: How do they work?
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-April/014232.html
Week 8:
Onion services, relay honesty, migration and families
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-April/014255.html
Week 9:
(There was no week 9)
== Now with an introduction
I left the Introduction section of the proposal till late in the
game; now I have it in place as a new section 1:
== Proposals into the pipeline
I've also revised all of the "other proposals" that were logically
separate from the rest of Walking Onions. Three of them were ready
to go to tor-dev, so I've added them as:
318-limit-protovers.md Limit protover values to 0-63.
319-wide-everything.md RELAY_FRAGMENT cells
320-tap-out-again.md Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services
== In the home stretch
I've got till the end of the month to wrap up this proposal, so
let's see where we are. We have a minimal viable proposal, I
believe: if we were to sit down and start implementing, we would
probably get most of the way based on what we have now.
There are a few additional things I'd like to wrap up before I call
the proposal done, however:
* I've got all the necessary machinery written up for generating and
calculating indices, but before I actually move ahead, I should
fill in the details in sections 2 through 4.
* One of the original goals of Walking Onions was to permit us to
move to alternative topologies where not every relay connects to
every other relay. That's not something that we can include in
this proposal, since the research here is quite preliminary, but
I still want to prepare for it by making sure that clients can
handle getting SNIPs that say "this SNIP is only valid when given
by a relay of type X".
* I should take another pass through the CDDL format to see whether
there are any opportunities to save a bunch of bytes. I should
also fill in a couple of example SNIPs to see how big they are
with this proposal.
* There are places all over the proposal where I have marked
uncertain points with XXXX. I should go through them and resolve
them all before I call the proposal done.
[INTRO] https://github.com/nmathewson/walking-onions-wip/blob/master/specs/01-intro.md
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev