Re: [tor-dev] stale entries in bwscan.20151029-1145

[starlight.2015q3@xxxxxxxxxxx]

At 11:47 11/5/2015 -0600, Tom Ritter wrote:
> . . .
>So them falling between the slices would be my
>best guess. . .

Immediately comes to mind that dealing
with the changing consensus while
scanning might be handled in a different
but nonetheless straightforward manner.

Why not create a snapshot of the consensus
at the time scanning commences then--
without disturbing the scanners--
pull each new update with an asynchronous
thread or process.  The consensus thread
would diff against the previous state
snapshot and produce an updated snapshot
plus deltas for each scanner and/or slice
as the implementation requires.  Then
briefly lock the working list for each
active scanner and apply the delta to it.

By having a single thread handle
consensus retrieval and sub-division,
issues of "lost" relays should
go away entirely.  No need to hold
locks for extended periods.

The consensus allocation thread would
run continuously, so individual slices
and scanners can complete and restart 
asynchronous to each other without
glitches or delays.

Consensus allocation worker could also
manage migrating relays from one scanner
to another, again preventing lost
relays.

_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev