Karsten Loesing: > On 2017-11-17 21:29, Georg Koppen wrote: >> Karsten Loesing: >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> we, the Tor Metrics Team, have finished writing our roadmap for the 12 >>> months between October 2017 and September 2018: >>> >>> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/raw-attachment/wiki/org/teams/MetricsTeam/metrics-team-roadmap-2017-11-17.pdf >>> >>> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/teams/MetricsTeam#RoadmapfromOctober2017toSeptember2018 >>> >>> In the process of writing this roadmap we incorporated feedback from >>> various people in the Tor community, including suggestions made on this >>> list. >>> >>> And if something didn't make it on this year's roadmap, we made a note >>> to reconsider in about a year from now. >> >> Hm. There are teams like the Tor Browser people who are doing roadmaps >> only from dev meeting to dev meeting, meaning for 6 months. Actually, >> that 6 months or dev-meeting to dev-meeting roadmapping is exactly what >> Isabela said we (should) do in >> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/2017-November/001564.html: >> >> """ >> - Next Tor Meeting is arriving, we do the balance of what we have >> finished, what we will carry on and start selecting tasks for the next >> roadmap we will be building at the next Tor Meeting. >> """ >> >> So I wonder how this fits into your model. I am especially concerned >> about stuff that comes up at the next dev meeting that would be a >> concern for the metrics team as it seems to me, reading what you wrote >> above, that it would not be considered for the roadmap for the current >> year but rather would have to wait for the year thereafter. > > I'm optimistic that we'd be able (and willing!) to make room for such needs. > > I just said (or meant to say) that we included some, but not all > suggestions we received over the past few weeks, and that we're going to > reconsider adding the ones we did not include now in next year's roadmap. > > Note that we picked 12 months as timeframe, not 6, because that seemed > to make more sense at the time we started writing this roadmap in > September 2017. The idea was to generate input for the fundraising team, > and my understanding was that a 6 month timeframe wouldn't be enough for > that. > > Hope this makes sense. It does. Thanks for these clarifications. Georg >> Georg > > All the best, > Karsten >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev