Re: [tor-dev] Update of prop#250: Random Number Generation During Tor Voting

[George Kadianakis <desnacked@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jesse V <kernelcorn@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> David,
>
> I'm in the midst of reworking my OnioNS design around prop250 (and the security
> analysis therein) and as far as I can tell these changes make sense. I like the
> 00:00 -> 24:00 change as it's more intuitive as you said. I was at first very
> concerned that you removed the majority requirement as that is the assumption
> made during consensus generation, but I think your argument for the new conflict
> resolution make sense. I'm excited that the implementation is nearly complete
> and I look forward to seeing it in Tor infrastructure!
>

Hello Jesse,

thanks for the feedback. Any opinions on whether we should keep the conflict
lines or forget about them, based on David's email and my email?

I just estimated that removing the conflict feature will kill about 400 lines of
code, which is always nice :)

Thanks :)
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev