Thus spake Mike Perry (mikeperry@xxxxxxxxxx):
> Case 2b:
>
> Wgg = Wee = weight_scale
> Wed = (weight_scale*(D - 2*E + G + M))/(3*D)
> Wmd = (weight_Scale*(D - 2*M + G + E))/(3*D)
> Wme = Wmg = 0
> Wgd = weight_scale - Wed - Wmd
>
> Wmd >= 0:
> D+G+E-2*M >= 0
D+G+E-2*M+M >= M
D+G+E+M >= 3*M
> T/3 >= M
>
> If your eyes haven't glazed over yet, you'll notice that this last
> condition can actually be true. If we don't hand out enough Guard
*sigh*... And, of course by "true" here, I actually meant "false", in
that there can be mathematical situations where M > T/3 and this
weight could thus take on a negative number. The rest of this
paragraph was correct, I just said "true" when I meant "false".
> flags, there may be too many middle nodes. In this case, the code just
> warns and suggests that the WFU parameters be lowered.
The code also sets this weight to 0 in this case, and adjusts Wgd
appropriately.
--
Mike Perry
Mad Computer Scientist
fscked.org evil labs
Attachment:
pgp2mJh2s3za6.pgp
Description: PGP signature