[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable transport weekly meeting



Ximin Luo:
> I assume people will be interested in creating Debian packages for
> these too. I am wondering if we should adopt a naming convention like
> tor-pt-sshproxy, tor-pt-flashproxy, tor-pt-obfsproxy etc - like how
> mozilla extensions are all called xul-ext-*. (We could even start a
> working group too.)
> 
> ATM this would involve renaming obfsproxy, but I am about to package
> flashproxy, and thinking about what to name the package.

I have heard people making the argument that obfsproxy, at least, was
not specific to Tor and could perfectly be used with plain SSH. The
prefix âtor-pt-â would not really be appropriate then.

-- 
Lunar                                             <lunar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev