Yawning Angel transcribed 2.7K bytes: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 07:01:58 +0000 > isis <isis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 3. Should we change how the BridgeAuthority tests Bridge ORPort > > reachability? If so, how? > > > > 4. If I'm going to refactor all of this, are there other (future) > > things I should take into account? > > > > For example, if self-testing is disabled for Bridges, and, due to > > #7349, [2] the BridgeAuthority isn't testing reachability either, > > then how will the BridgeAuthority know if (any of) the Bridge's PTs > > are reachable? (One solution might be to, in that case, have the > > BridgeAuthority lie and tell BridgeDB that such Bridges were > > reachable, letting BridgeDB do the PT reachability testing.) > > All of this seems to me like we need to sit down somewhere (in > meatspace or online), map out how the current system of: > > * Clients > * Bridges > * Bridge Guards > * The Bridge Authority > > fits together, and figure out how it can be redesigned in a way that is > more inline with how things work now/need to work now (PTs were not a > thing when this started being one of the bigger stumbling blocks). > > Regards, > > -- > Yawning Angel Sounds like something we could work on at the dev meeting? :) -- ââ isis agora lovecruft _________________________________________________________ OpenPGP: 4096R/0A6A58A14B5946ABDE18E207A3ADB67A2CDB8B35 Current Keys: https://blog.patternsinthevoid.net/isis.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev