On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 22:44:42 +0400 meejah <meejah@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Anyone who wants to open a ticket here, or has a counter > > argument? :) > > As a *slight* counter-argument to adding on-disk services to the > GETINFO, that would make it harder to distinguish between on-disk > services and ADD_ONION -based ones. Not sure how much of a practical > problem this is, though (worst-case would be that a controller would > have to load all 'hostname' files to confirm which ones are on-disk > vs. ADD_ONION). Perhaps a *third* GETINFO, e.g. "GETINFO > onions/permanent" would be safest...? Adding a third option would probably be the best, followed by extending the response syntax. As I said, the `GETINFO` stuff was added explicitly along and for the `ADD_ONION` command, with semantics to match. Regards, -- Yawning Angel
Attachment:
pgpObks78ZcPy.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev