Damian Johnson: > I'd be fine with the following alternative for a vote: ask on > tor-internal@ if anyone opposes to the ratification of the social > contract. If after two weeks zero people object then it's ratified. > > If at least one person says nay it goes to a vote. That's not a good idea. You would basically say "no" as you want to have a vote and then we'd have a vote. That would basically boil down to you saying "It's getting a vote because I, Damian, say it gets a vote." Georg > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Alison <macrina@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Silvia [Hiro]: >>> On 04/04/17 20:52, Georg Koppen wrote: >>> [snip] >>>> So, let's drop that re-ratifying idea of the same things altogether. It >>>> creates more problems than it solves and does not add more legitimacy to >>>> previous decisions. >>> Totally agree w/ this. >>> >>> -silvia >> >> I am totally fine to go with whatever is preferred by the majority. I >> initiated the proposal because I had a few requests for it. I know that >> Damian is one of the people who really wants a vote; I'm happy to leave >> this open for a few days and see if anyone else agrees with him. >> >> Alison >> _______________________________________________ >> tor-project mailing list >> tor-project@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project > _______________________________________________ > tor-project mailing list > tor-project@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-project mailing list tor-project@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project