> On 2 Aug 2016, at 10:51, Alison <macrina@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Mike, I think that this is valid criticism. I'd really like it if we > could at least clarify that we will always make most of our tools free > of cost. I've added that line to your revision: Can I suggest: "We will make most of our tools free of cost." I'm not sure if the "always" adds anything. Tim > > Mike Perry: >> Here's an attempt to reword to capture my thinking: >> >> 3. Our tools are universally available to access, use, adapt, and distribute >> >> The more diverse our users, the less simply being a user of Tor implies >> about any user, so we aim to create tools that anyone can access and >> use. We will always make most of our tools free of cost. We do not restrict access to our tools unless it is for the >> security of all users, and we design, build, and deploy our tools >> without collecting identifiable information about our users. We expect >> the code and research we publish to be improved by many different >> people, and that is only possible if everyone has the ability to use, >> copy, modify, and redistribute our tools. > _______________________________________________ > tor-project mailing list > tor-project@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmmp: teor at torproject dot org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ tor-project mailing list tor-project@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project