Lunar:
> [...]
> for the security of all users. {+Wealth should not be a determining
> factor to access our tools, and we do our best to distributed them
> free of charge or at a fair price.+} We design, build, and deploy
> [...]
I think this rewording nails it on the head: the spirit that we (I?)
want here in #3 is that we _should_ strive to make our tools as
accessible as possible with regard to acquisition, use, and reuse:
including (as Katie pointed out) the accessibility issue of cost. The
Social Contract should encourage everyone who works on Tor-related
projects to keep things like this (freedom of availability &
accessibility) in mind. (Along with the other points in the Social
Contract.) I think it does a great job at that.
Kudos to everyone who put this together and everybody who's been
contributing to this conversation.
--
Mike Tigas
@mtigas | https://mike.tig.as/ | 0xA993E7156E0E9923
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-project mailing list tor-project@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project