Hi juga, > On 29 Nov 2018, at 13:48, Vasilis <andz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Signed PGP part > teor: >>> On 28 Nov 2018, at 10:26, Vasilis <andz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Vasilis: >>>> teor: >>>>> The technical requirements are: >>>>> For sbws: >>>>> * A HTTP or HTTPS server that supports GET, HEAD, and Range >>>>> (for example, Apache or Nginx) >>>>> * A 1 GB file >>>>> https://gitweb.torproject.org/sbws.git/tree/DEPLOY.rst#n16 >>>> >>>> What are the upstream/downstream link requirements for sbws >>> Are the requirements in >>> https://gitweb.torproject.org/sbws.git/tree/INSTALL.rst#n57 >>> still accurate? >> >> The bandwidth requirements are slightly less than they used >> to be, because we turned off some optional features, and >> changed the scaling algorithm. >> >> You could probably use a 100 Mbits connection. > > I can provide a dedicated server with these requirements in a university > environment. I can roll a test version and maintain it if we decide that is useful. Do we need another test sbws server? Do we want to have one spare for the next bandwidth authority? T
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ tor-project mailing list tor-project@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project