> On 9 Mar 2017, at 22:24, David Fifield <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In November 2016 there was a discussion on the tor-team list about > adding some new default obfs4 bridges (Subject: Coordinating to run high > capacity obfs4 bridges). The thread turned into a discussion about the > same entity running both bridges and exits, and didn't go anywhere. > > We haven't added any new obfs4 bridges, or changed the port number of > any existing bridges, since January 2017 (Tor Browser 6.5 and 7.0a1). I > suspect that the 20 existing default bridges are still under high load > and we could stand to have some more bridges to help share it. Are we > still interested in adding new obfs4 bridges? If so, do we have any > leads on who could run them? Team Cymru and Mozilla recently asked how they could help out. (Cymru hosts a directory authority, I don't know whether either run exits.) John Ricketts volunteered, but he runs (about 6% of) exits. T -- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ tor-project mailing list tor-project@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project