> There has been a small amount of volunteer progress on maintaining > the current bandwidth authority code. > > But we haven't made any progress on bwscanner. Perhaps because we're > not sure who is working on it or where it is at. OK. I'll send Donncha a quick e-mail asking him about the current status. > To make progress, we need a list of priorities for bandwidth > authorities, and people with time to make them happen. This needs > people from the network team, and directory authority operators. > > > ... > > > > Meejah and I were planning to facilitate a workshop/discussion about > > these and other issues related to scanning the tor network. Are you > > coming to the meeting in Montreal? > > There's also a session on bandwidth authorities - do you think we should > merge the two? I'm not sure. Was anyone actually planning to attend the session about scanning the tor network besides meejah and I? If not then merge them. I definitely would attend the bandwidth authorities session. I think these network health issues are important and should get more attention since they very much affect the security properties of tor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tor-project mailing list tor-project@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project