[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] New relay questions

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] New relay questions
From: trinity pointard <trinity.pointard@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 14:26:46 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 08:27:41 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=IJWldl2cfdUiDH7jKlBFlIkucZ7TmWM9SuxkgKT1A1E=; b=hci62q/rih3zrWIA7vl7JEs2+6hSl4lyPO6bDojNrG2VEzBEtQKfP+eBr2/Jcgsilq Vz4zvW2I4pQehsUTyN++K4Y9L1ao/BHi6O1gURC/xRIDVPAoPi8jug/qI2y1jyQffTU8 lCQfxZqDX/itdDG3+XmCvRLqLHaNUOk72hILa+QeP+e7A+u79lTKaj1VFrES0/f1LlNM Jw1J65Ely5zVOc9M3J95kMufWJwWh3oCpAW+YtmX8nIvO0DsF/+ULNGELkxJjH4A31jZ vNn64LgatNAXjt1iScUBIdgSUfCUu00UdHFhgDKoW/YKrsYKhDwDDyOcWGupfYZx6z++ tP6A==
In-reply-to: <sHAqa6dOBQ7MLYeOeaTBhaBlYN7nEbw_wCB3Vj7BtYIPzMiKD9xiE-nAJjXIOokhZ9PwLYg9inKcrK_YWrDGSetBsLZ6QiOc9ZwTNAA45FU=@pm.me>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <sHAqa6dOBQ7MLYeOeaTBhaBlYN7nEbw_wCB3Vj7BtYIPzMiKD9xiE-nAJjXIOokhZ9PwLYg9inKcrK_YWrDGSetBsLZ6QiOc9ZwTNAA45FU=@pm.me>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,

First thanks for operating a new relay and welcome 😀

> The logs report success and the Relay Search shows my relay (Nickname: code9nRelay) running but the advertised bandwidth is 0 B/s.
> It’s been running for 13 hours or so and I see a new relay that has been running for 1 hour has an advertised bandwidth of 12MiB/s.

Your relay being brand new, it has not yet been measured : the network
(and your relay itself) has no idea how much bandwidth it's able to
handle. During the
following days, it will get little to no attention from most clients
until it gets better known. For more information on the lifecycle of
new relays, I recommend
reading https://blog.torproject.org/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay/ .
As for the relay you looked at, maybe it restarted recently, but it's
likely to be known for some time, and there are good estimations of
its available bandwidth.

> I had my email address as my first contact then my GPG fingerprint as a second contact but the fingerprint is displayed not the email.  Now I have it all on one line with the email address first.

There can be only one contact info for a relay. So yeah, you should
indeed put everything in a single line.

> Which brings me to my main question; when I run systemctl restart tor@default shouldn’t the new settings in the torrc file be used from that point on?  Because they don’t seem to be.
>  I have run it after making the changes above and the old settings are still shown on the Relay Search page.  Ie  0KB/s and my GPG fingerprint showing as my email address.
>  If this restart doesn’t reset the torrc then what does?  Or is it just a matter of waiting for the new info to be taken up?

metrics.torproject.org doesn't get informations in real time. First
your changes in configuration needs to make it into the consensus,
which is an hourly process, and then data has to flow a bit
around. It's not abnormal for metrics.tpo to only get updated an hour
or two after you made your changes (fwiw, it currently shows both your
email and GPG fingerprint).

Regards,

trinity-1686a


On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 13:03, code9n via tor-relays
<tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Relay Operators,
>
>   I am trying to run a non exit relay for the first time and have some questions:
>
>  FYI, I have 2 virtual CPU s and 1.256 GB RAM with ‘unlimited’ bandwidth on a rented VPS running Debian 11.
>
>   The logs report success and the Relay Search shows my relay (Nickname: code9nRelay) running but the advertised bandwidth is 0 B/s.
>   It’s been running for 13 hours or so and I see a new relay that has been running for 1 hour has an advertised bandwidth of 12MiB/s.
>
>   I did set the bandwidth to 100KB/s, then 200KB/s  but now it’s just set to run the defaults.  Ie  Nothing is set.
>
>   I had my email address as my first contact then my GPG fingerprint as a second contact but the fingerprint is displayed not the email.  Now I have it all on one line with the email address first.
>
> Which brings me to my main question; when I run systemctl restart tor@default shouldn’t the new settings in the torrc file be used from that point on?  Because they don’t seem to be.
>   I have run it after making the changes above and the old settings are still shown on the Relay Search page.  Ie  0KB/s and my GPG fingerprint showing as my email address.
>   If this restart doesn’t reset the torrc then what does?  Or is it just a matter of waiting for the new info to be taken up?
>
>       Any one have any thoughts or advice, please?
>
>      Pete
>
>
>   Here are the recent logs:
>
> Dec 14 20:05:31.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 6:00 hours, with 10 circuits open. I've sent 188.82 MB and received 168.28 MB. I've received 14629 connections on IPv4 and 1847 on IPv6. I've made 171 connections with IPv4 and 8 with IPv6.
> Dec 14 20:05:31.000 [notice] While not bootstrapping, fetched this many bytes: 3951317 (server descriptor fetch); 944 (server descriptor upload); 358850 (consensus network-status fetch); 49621 (microdescriptor fetch)
> Dec 14 20:05:31.000 [notice] Average packaged cell fullness: 95.570%. TLS write overhead: 16%
> Dec 14 20:05:31.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 0/0 TAP, 37259/37259 NTor.
> Dec 14 20:05:31.000 [notice] Since startup we initiated 0 and received 0 v1 connections; initiated 0 and received 0 v2 connections; initiated 0 and received 0 v3 connections; initiated 0 and received 0 v4 connections; initiated 60 and received 16368 v5 connections.
> Dec 14 20:05:31.000 [notice] Heartbeat: DoS mitigation since startup: 0 circuits killed with too many cells, 0 circuits rejected, 0 marked addresses, 0 marked addresses for max queue, 0 same address concurrent connections rejected, 0 connections rejected, 0 single hop clients refused, 0 INTRODUCE2 rejected.
> Dec 15 02:05:31.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 12:00 hours, with 3 circuits open. I've sent 375.23 MB and received 326.98 MB. I've received 32711 connections on IPv4 and 3289 on IPv6. I've made 306 connections with IPv4 and 14 with IPv6.
> Dec 15 02:05:31.000 [notice] While not bootstrapping, fetched this many bytes: 8221506 (server descriptor fetch); 944 (server descriptor upload); 766467 (consensus network-status fetch); 80676 (microdescriptor fetch)
> Dec 15 02:05:31.000 [notice] Average packaged cell fullness: 94.792%. TLS write overhead: 18%
> Dec 15 02:05:31.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 0/0 TAP, 37813/37813 NTor.
> Dec 15 02:05:31.000 [notice] Since startup we initiated 0 and received 0 v1 connections; initiated 0 and received 0 v2 connections; initiated 0 and received 0 v3 connections; initiated 0 and received 0 v4 connections; initiated 88 and received 35765 v5 connections.
> Dec 15 02:05:31.000 [notice] Heartbeat: DoS mitigation since startup: 0 circuits killed with too many cells, 0 circuits rejected, 0 marked addresses, 0 marked addresses for max queue, 0 same address concurrent connections rejected, 0 connections rejected, 0 single hop clients refused, 0 INTRODUCE2 rejected.
> Dec 15 02:31:35.000 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done.
>
> ……………………………………...
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] New relay questions
  - From: code9n via tor-relays

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] cannot keep my bridge up
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Setting a relay as an HSDirectory?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] New relay questions
Next by thread: [tor-relays] Setting a relay as an HSDirectory?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread