On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:51:35 -0400 Steve Snyder <swsnyder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> allegedly wrote: > Allowing exits from ports 80 and 443 will always carry the risk of > abuse complaints. > > It would be better to retain 80 and 443 as exit ports and just block > traffic to the Google/Yahoo/AOL/etc. mail servers but I don't how > that could be done with their respective load-balancing schemes. IP address based policy is tricky to use when large systems can use wide address ranges. And these addresses change over time. Question for tor developers. How hard would it be to change the logic (and syntax) of exit policy in tor to allow domain based formulations like: reject *.gmail.com reject *aol.com etc. Mick --------------------------------------------------------------------- blog: baldric.net fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B 72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312 Note that I have recently upgraded my GPG key see: http://baldric.net/2012/07/20/gpg-key-upgrade/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays