[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit
From: Green Dream <greendream848@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 13:14:08 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:14:24 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yEbmdT4smLWBUabv2sFlc3wD2cIpSF0jZknmFSWxCj0=; b=EuQILd+WL0W30E7Feghwp3ea49LJzM9frncBlfiuZy0LA85SDEN9CudXfXv639uW5y jylLQAsPFQ/IPgDpT/KnMLxaGPnB7QfVS8Hppt4YgZ+rHgIGYQmEluYRzPewd41G0C9x 6B50mZ8bbKmvn/mg7Z8Zp02ptA0WIx1GjOjFz1A+9d33U5Mti5IkdpmWT/nUKLdj/8HP gESJlFAoOMWTJO2adqvHt12d0Wz48tXQcrdyTbhZpKLiDMpLD1LgNycrhEjiosirOTds lmeQkkSsKEHHkpkHYbKQAicPcDWtVg87AziFQWT63zn9yfwMke0y8fMSVD6lCCne1sjN wl+A==
In-reply-to: <CALsPhAEA4QTET67cvd4iZR2=hAmLsYk4N0Mudogy=KY=MGzLrQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20160712192940.GA9340@partyvan.eu> <fb4adc7a-6ce3-cfbc-6596-ee5b3f37d073@gmx.de> <CALsPhAEA4QTET67cvd4iZR2=hAmLsYk4N0Mudogy=KY=MGzLrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> IMO it is not necessary to open all 65535 ports, 1 or 2 dozen

> are enough to cover a majority of the needs of the users.

For a minimal exit, you really only need "at least two of the ports 80, 443, and 6667" to qualify. Ref: https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2133

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit (was: Re: Exit node situation in Finland)
  - From: Juuso Lapinlampi
- Re: [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit
  - From: Toralf Förster
- Re: [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit
  - From: Markus Koch

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] suspicious "Relay127001" relays
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] arm and non-default control port
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread