[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-relays] Question about Bridges Bandwidth Authority
- To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [tor-relays] Question about Bridges Bandwidth Authority
- From: s7r <s7r@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 19:36:59 +0300
- Autocrypt: addr=s7r@xxxxxxxxxx; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBE9BogQBCADazBiEe0PGTgeUJ/JU4BDvdE2ZFD+MUOgf3+n78F6mXTxcLgyiE/3E4rA5 Sy3NzVRjqjzyn/MyDJDbsRpSKT6uVT5thYNyfDNBNqYmqdVS8Gu+H90z78x1WJ+DxVawk4IM mi8jmKcwlz7hOGROsR0+NyWjyghlzNHVgiJkWIvp5AVDg4F6o2oCH/vBbgomu3Ho5r7fiRZg I0uxsMLIkRI8bwB3SlVi3n4a94ZI2R9rXD9KNWzW4OT5LnICW1d/cuktwVBQRxGE6KFtVDzI chjuDWFaT9p6qROqoBRbsGF/mLg/sb26dwRxb7CnxfCWJn10ZGWo8jG6MM/QKEcxSj0JABEB AAG0NHM3ckBza3ktaXAub3JnIChBbm9ueW1pdHkgbWF0dGVycyEpIDxzN3JAc2t5LWlwLm9y Zz6JATgEEwECACIFAk9BogQCGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEIN/pSyB JlsRbkQH/jfe6F9nbwwFBo2DuNJ+Ci2IpZEco1P6rWh2l3AzG0vOD82nYJ5uFIw+0v615tW8 WWNfeIsrbCRnmOAx8NGkGsk/j+SRJb41pQ79tyxdBg7txcbT9bAdcaImYoBBp+1bnyrAaROB 1wDq0jKX09ofKrrAUWOlddASpIBG5uKMLhHe1X14lmvgGHWDPHKrw4yzBN/nNfXYr+Ayjt9s NM6JETHIgqO6uvchiT20v2/SzD3FlysROkPeoFjGWUwAqH2r7RQyDLF6EoqkrcuwvjFXiOFE nFdNRbHQsKYXPhbk2JUiFQQcdLtJg6iaoRBnhATl4V6soP2EHYn3K1bz+eYL+AS5AQ0ET0Gi BAEIAMO7MGEfdMn72SQAK0m5rcEPj3mtSRRokMHl3YBNjFbj3O4QAwjpKBJ7RuPdF9B9IDAP a7mc+f33mpIgRnxKDwkjswPk74mMQRxe2wgv4AQ7yBICYYK99e6RYP0LC1PDIGXFPLjs0Teu QAxASFvNycC5JSfQUsAI3OTQjaGUaiUfavmJYkn9B6C2ktQgvM7qbxJvLP5X02tgp4G4gNiu 8ZA3aOUdX+8EQwERJZ8CuA/R6/2M2nEO3YRCsxaYSzob7nicjfoPvyvSYu3zXRFj+3uvDOK6 AGNILmftVUoRQ6/WsNaAQX42cDfSNYQ8uZ/zgTGatO3ArNb1uqWbMdbUA5sAEQEAAYkBHwQY AQIACQUCT0GiBAIbDAAKCRCDf6UsgSZbEZjSB/41TviTCxdiS4PLSDrQ3GOmQPpWZRk/O1tv 3y6T9p0XuC/oq6kKfToKuV2/Ok+589rtmrXhjzdk2otDKCRGejJFpVoU/vfR+jokArzpwyPa TWDAhMGmf5wmEAojsiOc9Zgj/CuS5nd/eLFi4QGtbLoDLrTrQSXB4qR0zJFoQfykVaERT2dm UV/D22opJc8jo3UBOBckgGi9jBi/2OvwEiFcZSl1u9Qi4+gbINOObQF5a0h9ReZCT1BUs5FV DSXBBYZTJJ2flnZH69Mb+9KxRMyqjhRzyGDUfY73SYlCpKX9buWMl0CCsDx+GrRVSxvQnA8b aSq1wlfKsJBimGtSAqf8
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:37:21 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sky-ip.org; s=20110108; t=1563986227; bh=jRFr4hCSbz0Wp3kc9RpKp/Fs0zsIRiHg9W+4afkDVwA=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=CMuP8xvfYPrWJNs0kouSCreFB8I610cFJNebZc9eRa4YzzhFdXAPUXXFIQ/sWKJKq 8E9FmsMSPQBIM3UypYMv8RQCAcsQo70IWu5lr78UHYod5RwD/3Sou5Nh9Jd8VG2mr7 d4ryoswzJ0cMpmv5pJezpsRJb6grs3v/biSujSVo=
- List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
- List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
- List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
- Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
Hello,
I'd like to know more details about how exactly the bridge bandwidth
authority works, and if we use the "weight" of each bridge for anything.
For example, I have setup 5 obfs4 bridges, with the exact very same
hardware resources and all on the same network speed of course.
One of them gets used by clients (say 20-50 unique clients every 6 hours
or so) while the rest of 4 are not used at all. This usage is not a
concern for me, as its known bridges take time until they get used,
depending on which bucket they have been assigned and etc. So I assume
it's OK at this particular point in their lifetime to be unused by any
client.
But what I am curious about is, when I search them on RelaySearch, the
used one has a measured bandwidth of over 2 MiB/s (and has the fast
flag) while other 3 unused ones have bandwidths of between 50 and 60
KiB/s (these also have the fast flag) and there is one last one which is
also not used and has a bandwidth of less than 10 KiB/s that does not
have the fast flag. (Fast flag missing is also not my problem, I am just
mentioning it as a side detail).
Now I know for sure those values are not at all in according to the real
environment. Each bridge should be at least capable of 3 MiB/s even if
all 5 are used at the same time at their full speeds. Actually I have
simulated this, it's not just theoretical.
Is there anything related to usage, so that the bridge bandwidth
authority only measures the used bridges? What could have cause such big
discrepancy in my particular case, any ideas?
Also, do we use the weight of each bridge in order to determine how much
% probability it has to be served to a request in the bucket that is
part of, or we don't use bridge weights for anything at all?
Thanks!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays