[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs
From: Thoughts <thoughts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 19:31:41 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 May 2022 13:22:28 -0400
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0

For a non-exit relay, is "NumCPUs 2" still the recommended maximum? Running on a quad core and recently saw a message indicating I hadinsufficient CPU power to support the desired number of connections...


Thanks,

Kevin

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs
  - From: dlugasny via tor-relays
- Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs
  - From: lists
- Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs
  - From: Roger Dingledine
- Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs
  - From: Roman Mamedov

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs
Next by Author: [tor-relays] Relay migration: best practices?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] [Workshop] Sysadmin 101 for (new) relay operators - June 4th
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread