On 10/23/2013 10:09 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
Hello Tor relay operators,
We could use your help in a pilot project to improve Tor security.
As
you may be aware, the anonymity of a connection over Tor is
vulnerable
to an adversary who can observe it in enough places along its
route.
For example, traffic that crosses the same country as it enters
and
leaves the Tor network can potentially be deanonymized by an
authority
in that country who can monitor all network communication.
Researchers
have been working to figure out how Tor traffic gets routed over
the
Internet [0-3], but determining routes with high confidence has
been
difficult.
That's where you come in. To figure out where traffic travels from
your relay, we'd like you to run a bunch of "traceroutes" -
network
measurements that show the paths traffic takes. This is a one-time
experiment for now, but, depending on what we find out, regularly
making such measurements may become a part of Tor itself. We have
already gotten some results thanks to Linus Nordberg of DFRI and
Moritz Bartl of
torservers.net, and now it's time to ask all relay operators to
help.
We would like to start this right away.
We have written some shell scripts to automate most of the
process.
The easiest way for you to get them is with git, using the
following
commands:
 git clone
https://bitbucket.org/anupam_das/traceroute-from-tor-relays
 git checkout f253f768d14e3368e4fe4de9895acd2715a19412
You can also just download the files directly by visiting [4].
Detailed instructions for setting up and running the experiment
are in
the README.
Basically the experiment does traceroutes to three groups: all
"routable IP prefixes", all Tor relays, and then all /24 subnets.
These kinds of measurements are not uncommon, and they will not be
done at a high rate. By default the scripts will periodically move
the
results to our server [5] via SSH, although you can keep the
results
around and/or not send them automatically if you wish (see the
README). The traceroute data recorded is not sensitive or private
at
all. We plan to make the code and data public, following Tor's
practice of open cooperation with the research community [6].
The measurements will work best if you have the "scamper" tool
from
the Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis (CAIDA)
installed (see the README for installation instructions). This is
a
standard and open-source tool that handles the many modern
complexities of Internet routing measurement. If you are not able
to
run scamper, the script will also work with the more-common but
less-accurate and slower "traceroute" utility. We do not currently
have support for Windows relays. The output will take up around
500KB
(110MB if you disable automatic removal after upload) disk space
if
you use scamper; on the other hand if you use "traceroute" utility
each output will be around 4MB (1GB with automatic removal after
upload disabled). * *Depending on whether you run scamper or
traceroute the total time required varies but results for
traceroutes
to "routable IP prefixes" and all Tor relays should finish within
one
week (possibly earlier). We would like to request relay operators
to
upload those results once finished.* *
This experiment is in collaboration with several researchers, but
the
leads are Anupam Das, a Ph.D. student at the University of
Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign, and his advisor Nikita Borisov. Based on a
review of
the scripts of commit f253f768d14e3368e4fe4de9895acd2715a19412, we
believe that they operate as described above. Please do read
through
them yourself, and let us know if you have any questions or
concerns.
And also feel free to contact any of us for help or with
suggestions.
Because of you, Tor is the "king" of anonymous communication.Â
With
your help, we will keep improving to face the new challenges to
privacy and freedom online.
Thank you,
Karsten Loesing <karsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Anupam Das <das17@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Nikita Borisov <nikita@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[0] "Protecting anonymity in the presence of autonomous system and
internet exchange level adversaries" by Joshua Juen. Master's
Thesis,
UIUC. 2012.
<https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/34363>
[1] "Users Get Routed: Traffic Correlation on Tor by Realistic
Adversaries" by Aaron Johnson, Chris Wacek, Rob Jansen, Micah
Sherr,
and Paul Syverson. ACM CCS 2013.
<http://freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/ccs2013-usersrouted.pdf>
[2] "AS-awareness in Tor path selection" by Matthew Edman and Paul
F.
Syverson. ACM CCS 2009.
<http://freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/DBLP:conf/ccs/EdmanS09.pdf>
[3] "Sampled Traffic Analysis by Internet-Exchange-Level
Adversaries"
by Steven J. Murdoch and Piotr ZieliÅski. PETS 2007.
<http://freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/murdoch-pet2007.pdf>
[4]
https://bitbucket.org/anupam_das/traceroute-from-tor-relays/downloads
[5] ttat-control.iti.illinois.edu
[6] https://metrics.torproject.org/
Is this Big Brother phishing for better ways to compromise the Tor
network?
>
_______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
|