[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] mitigating or defeating syntax analysis

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OT] mitigating or defeating syntax analysis
From: Michael Rogers <m.rogers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 18 Apr 2008 10:12:23 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:14:30 -0400
In-reply-to: <48079F25.8050302@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48079F25.8050302@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Apr 17 2008, scar wrote:

are there any scholarly papers or websites with this information, or at
least talking more about syntax analysis (perhaps there is a more proper
technical term)?


Hi Scar,

You might be interested in this paper:http://ai.eller.arizona.edu/COPLINK/publications/CACM_From%20Fingerprint%20to%20Writeprint.pdfhttp://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1121949.1121951


Cheers,
Michael

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] mitigating or defeating syntax analysis
  - From: Roy Lanek

References:
- [OT] mitigating or defeating syntax analysis
  - From: scar

Prev by Author: Re: Ubuntu Tor LiveCD: making your own with Remastersys
Next by Author: Re: getting more exit nodes
Previous by thread: Re: [OT] mitigating or defeating syntax analysis
Next by thread: Re: [OT] mitigating or defeating syntax analysis
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread