[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:14:05 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:14:12 -0400
In-reply-to: <268519.88089.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Tripple Moon's message of "Thu\, 16 Apr 2009 18\:00\:05 -0700 \(PDT\)")
References: <200904160612.n3G6Cqeh000274@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <268519.88089.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)

> A better [idea] would be, again IMHO, open a list of ports used by
> "normal-use of the tor-network", and block the rest.  [...]

> Web (80,443), Pop3 (*), NNTP (*), DNS (53), Torrent (default 6881), FTP
> (20/21).

Moon,

Please don't give this kind of advice.  Somebody might think you know what
you're speaking about.

Your list includes Bittorrent, which is a highly optimised protocol for
sending massive amounts of data.  Running BT over the tor network is
considered as an abuse of the network.

Your list doesn't include for example 22 (ssh), which is absolutely
essential for many of us.

                                        Juliusz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days
  - From: Tripple Moon

References:
- Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days
  - From: Scott Bennett
- Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days
  - From: Tripple Moon

Prev by Author: Re: Version checking (was Re: 25 tbreg relays in directory)
Next by Author: Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days
Previous by thread: Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days
Next by thread: Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread