[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] two tors?
How does multiple proxies interfere with the anonymity of Tor exactly? For instance, if I use a portable browser from JonDo, another portable broswer that is a PenTeser chome version, also along with a high anonymity proxy switcher and an IP spoofer. Is this over-kill? I'm not trying to hide anything really I just like privacy. Should Tor and Vidalia be the ONLY software? When I do WHOIS in each browser, they all are different IPs but non of them are my real IP. Any insight anyone?
From: James Brown <jbrownfirst@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 7, 2012 6:32 AM
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] two tors?
On 06.04.2012 20:31, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 04:01:59PM -0000, BigTor wrote:
>>> I have two internet apps that I want to run the same time, both using tor
>>> socks proxy. I do not want the data streams of the apps routing thorugh
>>> the same circuit. Is it safe two run two tor processes, with different
>>> proxy ports?
>> If you configure and use it right, I think it's safe. Remember to change
>> the SocksPort option in torrc and to let tor use different pidfiles.
> Actually, you can do it with a single Tor and multiple SocksPort lines,
> if you're using Tor 0.2.3.x. See this piece of 0.2.3.3-alpha's changelog:
> o Major features (stream isolation):
> - You can now configure Tor so that streams from different
> applications are isolated on different circuits, to prevent an
> attacker who sees your streams as they leave an exit node from
> linking your sessions to one another. To do this, choose some way
> to distinguish the applications: have them connect to different
> SocksPorts, or have one of them use SOCKS4 while the other uses
> SOCKS5, or have them pass different authentication strings to the
> SOCKS proxy. Then, use the new SocksPort syntax to configure the
> degree of isolation you need. This implements Proposal 171.
> - There's a new syntax for specifying multiple client ports (such as
> SOCKSPort, TransPort, DNSPort, NATDPort): you can now just declare
> multiple *Port entries with full addr:port syntax on each.
> The old *ListenAddress format is still supported, but you can't
> mix it with the new *Port syntax.
> You can read more details in the SOCKSPort entry of the 0.2.3 Tor manual.
> The advantage to using one Tor with multiple SocksPort lines is that
> you don't load down the Tor network with duplicate directory fetches.
Can you provide the examle of such torrc-configuration?
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk mailing list