[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] CloudFlare
Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That page is a very predictable side effect of having a flag for people
> with strong need for privacy. I guess we know which Wikipedia users are
> valuable or doing something interesting, right? o_0
Disabling account creation by Tor users also doesn't prevent the more
insidious conflict-of-interest editing problem on Wikipedia.
Why not allow account creation via Tor, but limit each node to X per day,
require email validation, and build in a time delay before they can be used
to edit? Maybe block page creation and edits on semi-protected pages
entirely? It would be annoying to spammers and vandals, but still allow
real users to get involved.
It would be cool if accounts could be anonymity-enabled in such a way
that they could submit "anonymous" edits (where their real username is only
visible to admins or high-level moderators). That's doable with Mediawiki
installations, so why not Wikipedia itself?
Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That page is a very predictable side effect of having a flag for people
> with strong need for privacy. I guess we know which Wikipedia users are
> valuable or doing something interesting, right? o_0
Yeah, that's a bit problematic, especially in light of the recent French
police / Wikipedia kerfuffle.
--
Please note that I do not have PGP access at this time.
OTR: saint@xxxxxxxxxxxxx / fontaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk