[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] [tor-dev] Linux kernel transproxy packet leak (w/ repro case + workaround)

On Saturday 29 March 2014 03:10:47 grarpamp wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:20 PM, intrigeri <intrigeri@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > grarpamp wrote (28 Mar 2014 21:02:35 GMT) :
> >> [...] what happens with entire vm IP transproxy (perhaps like
> >> Tails)?
> > 
> > Tails only uses a transproxy for the automapped .onion addresses:
> > https://tails.boum.org/contribute/design/Tor_enforcement/
> My mistake. I think I meant to say whonix [1], just haven't followed
> the developments of those two projects in quite some time.
> [1] Or any model that sandboxes apps/OS/vm behind a firewall that
> redirects all tcp and dns traffic into tor Trans* options and drops
> the rest.

As the maintainer of the qubes-tor (TorVM) plugin for Qubes, I'm definitely 
interested in this answer as I imagine Patrick @ whonix is too.

I'll see if I can reproduce this bug with the Qubes context [0]


[0]: https://github.com/abeluck/qubes-tor/blob/master/start_tor_proxy.sh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to