[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: So TOR is NOT really anonoymous!?

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: So TOR is NOT really anonoymous!?
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 03:12:55 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 03:13:08 -0400
In-reply-to: <43058224.4020809@sinapsi.org>
References: <43058224.4020809@sinapsi.org>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 08:54:28AM +0200, Uhuru wrote:
> So I have to keep java always turned off?

In short, yes.

Anonymity is hard. If anybody else does the java thing right, feel free
to let us know. As far as I understand it, it's a tradeoff, and the
other option is having you write mail with a subject "So Tor doesn't
really work?!"

See http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Apr-2005/msg00143.html and
the rest of that thread.

See also
http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#TotallyAnonymous

--Roger

References:
- So TOR is NOT really anonoymous!?
  - From: Uhuru

Prev by Author: Re: Gentoo's response on them blocking access to their forums via Tor
Next by Author: Tor GUI Competition announcement
Previous by thread: So TOR is NOT really anonoymous!?
Next by thread: Re: So TOR is NOT really anonoymous!?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread