[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
privoxy/firefox
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: privoxy/firefox
- From: Arrakis Tor <arrakistor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:46:09 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 22:46:52 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=IHsg3SHqOS7sqehRiPbzvGlbELWz8B8hrBwLrWqbbXcfupdoPOPhKwXrNkO7g/C512mViQLkMrnmTejvblxUN5u7fBPZ45vK3fyWzcfZWPla0mkr7Hn0gYZRVr9NoO7Gv9UImUHxRiZLM5qTh6EbwNYKPasc+WStiJ+Y8XJSjr0=
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other than not having cookies blocked, Is there anything to lose by
not having privoxy installed, and using firefox as its own sock5
proxy? Does this compromise security by dns headers?
This is in reference to:
http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/FireFoxUsage