Re: Abuse statistics

[Phil <philtickle200@xxxxxxxxx>]

My guess is mplsfox02 is running a sniffer on his exit node that accepts PCRE regexs as filters. Ethereal?


--- On Thu, 8/7/08, M <maillist@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: M <maillist@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Abuse statistics
> To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Thursday, August 7, 2008, 9:00 PM
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> mplsfox02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > scar:
> >> mplsfox02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx @ 2008/08/05 07:24:
> >>> So the profilers feed the
> >>> spammers? :-)
> >>
> >> what's with the happy face? you get a kick out
> of this, playing
> >> detective?
> > 
> > Wow, icy wind here. For me this situation has
> something tragicomical.
> > Sorry for disturbing you serious life.
> > 
> >> most of us already assume this is happening. we
> don't need your
> >> statistics.
> > 
> > I think it's always a good thing to move towards
> less assumptions and
> > more knowledge. And please be more humble and
> don't speak as "we". There
> > were at least several people appreciating the stats.
> > 
> >> as is said in the FAQ, criminals already have
> better ways of doing
> >> things without Tor.
> > 
> > So? I'm not looking at criminals but general usage
> patterns, "abuse" and
> > side-effects. I'm doing this for my own, but I
> think it's fair to share it.
> > 
> 
> Statistics were pretty interesting.
> 
> Could you share the script(?) which collects statistics?
> I'm not
> currently running exit-node, couple of middlemans only.
> I'm just curious
> about the approach to collecting data. Where do you get the
> connection
> info? Are you running Linux? Bash, perl, php or something
> else?
> 
> m
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
> http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkibOCoACgkQeaKwdrf2V0rG8QCgjPXsTFA4JYVQcWe5T4sxqcwW
> pWAAnjKIZJxaG/iveSDCMhF9FzLMi5bR
> =sDLR
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----