[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Confusion about TorButton, Noscript, etc.
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Confusion about TorButton, Noscript, etc.
- From: Ringo Kamens <2600denver@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:43:53 -0400
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:44:01 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sNDApkwj2oSipoQRwHW3ebLiQ3MCc1B44iO6XvU8sTU=; b=sWYga3VWQTUqezkiMASk2LVvDo036T/imvCHTeBaq+8YguzzuD6PpY0GD0tUKHMraY nwMcvIRp13psvtyh3A6k69A3Sp+fleeq3pv30U95V+PjrIdTgG0q2NveUHvnXbQCMmH5 RpCH+I4c+EAdN5+qxxfbuV+ErN2ErgSVmxL+o=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=iPY8aVMJRXB0QaBV+tOvFIRQiHsP81C2N7LACK/caX7aQ7u5MwZNNCRbEDb7wL5i0X KP8+dDKIDWOzJPZ1wtvqzFRUzf6nof1kVyistDTLZ4prcJbvzFpbzMwijp/KrYAC1OEG 64Ow5ijjcEq7UP7ZkKK8xm54CCNrOr8nZGmzs=
- In-reply-to: <200808181325.m7IDPrEM010497@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <200808181325.m7IDPrEM010497@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Scott Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:57:42 +0200 sigi <dugongs@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:17:57AM +0200, Karsten N. wrote:
>>> Ringo Kamens schrieb:
>>>> I'm working on a presentation where I teach people how to install Tor. I
>>>> have always heard it is best practice to use NoScript and TorButton, but
>>>> TorButton automatically hooks "dangerous javascript". Is there any
>>>> reason to have noscript installed after that?
>>> NoScript blocks other "dangerous content" like Java applets, flash,
>>> siverlight... too. And it discover cross site scripting. So I prefer
>>> NoScript and FoxyProxy.
>>>
>>> FoxyProxy offers the possibility to configure some sites to be used
>>> with a preselected proxy, may be switch to "tor" for all http://*.onion*
>> In the faq <https://www.torproject.org/torbutton/faq.html>
>> they warn you about foxyproxy.
>>
>> What about other plugins like QuickJava? I think I don't need it
>> anymore with Torbutton installed, but do they confuse each other?
>>
> NoScript handles everything indisdcriminately, IIRC. QuickJava allows
> one to disable Java, while enabling JavaScript. NoScript then allows one
> to disable JavaScript on a site-by-site basis, while Java is disabled for
> all sites by QuickJava. QuickJava puts two small buttons at the bottom of
> a Firefox window, one for Java and one for JavaScript. Clicking on a
> QuickJava button toggles the enabled/disabled status of whichever feature
> it controls, so if you need to override it momentarily, it's trivial to do
> so and then toggle it back as soon as you've gotten what you need.
> I'm currently using old software: Firefox 1.5.0.8, TorButton 1.4.0.01,
> and SwitchProxy 1.4. My NoScript is 1.7.8 and should be reasonably current
> because it's still getting updated frequently. I'm not at all happy about
> the ancient Firefox, but I'm kind of stuck with this setup until I next
> install a new FreeBSD release. Looks like the FreeBSD team has begun talking
> about 7.1 lately, so it might even happen before the end of the year. (I
> generally avoid x.0 releases, so have sat with 6.3 quite a while. However,
> my ports tree is stuck at over a year ago, so no Firefox or TorButton
> updates. :-< )
> Anyway, QuickJava is a nice complement to NoScript.
>
>
> Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
> **********************************************************************
> * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
> *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
> * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good *
> * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
> * -- a standing army." *
> * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
> **********************************************************************
>
So just to confirm, if I install TorButton, that's all the protection I
need and I don't need to worry about NoScript?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIqdD4mBTzXUpNYqQRAgqaAKCPSjpkeNyyh+u9QuDkzH4h6pVlXgCdH8lS
utv7jUvOWDFepQZ1wT/mL/w=
=Zxju
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----